|
table
of contents | previous chapter | next
chapter | bottom of page | buy
this book | home
You are welcome to distribute printed copies of this document, or copy and paste this document to distribute via email, as long as the document is unaltered and kept in its entirety (including copyright notices), and is not sold for profit. However, if you wish to post this material on your website or anywhere else online, you must first contact us to get permission. Should you have received this document from someone else, you may want to get your own original copy at www.shepherdserve.org just to be certain you have an unaltered copy. The actual book itself may be ordered by clicking the link above. ©2007 by David Servant
FOUR
The Angel on Your Shoulder
Who says its wrong to have sex with someone elses wife? I
can do my own thing. There are no such things as moral absolutes. Im not
bound by the rules invented by some ancient religious killjoys.
If I could find someone who really believed that philosophy to the degree that
he lived it out consistently, then I might listen to him. But I havent
found a person yet, who in his every day life, consistently walks and talks
as if there really are no moral absolutes.
The most hedonistic playboy still has a code of ethics that he limitedly lives
by and that he expects others to live by. As I have said previously, that code
of ethics is built in by God. Whether we want to admit it or not, we all
know what is right and what is wrong.
Lets take the playboy who says he sees nothing wrong with having an affair
with another mans wife. His motto is, If it feels good, do it. If he really believes there are no moral absolutes, then he should never
complain when other people whove adopted the same motto commit selfish
acts that hurt him.
If I decide to take a sledgehammer and smash the windshield of his car, then
he has no right to criticize me. If he does, Ill just say, Hey,
I felt like doing it. It made me feel good. And besides, there are no such things
as moral absolutes. There is no right and wrong. Im not going to be bound
by some stupid law that some ancient killjoy invented.
How do you think that playboy would react to my line of reasoning? Hed
object violently because he believes in a code of ethics. Its not right
to destroy another persons property. Everyone in the world knows that,
even people who live in the most primitive societies. Furthermore, people have always known that it is wrong to act in their own self-interest if others
are harmed in the process.
Self-Evident Moral Absolutes
Our founding fathers expressed it eloquently when they penned, We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal... These
truths are self-evident. Selfishness is wrong because all people, created
in Gods image, are equal-equally loved by God.
When we act on our own behalf in such a way that causes others to suffer, we
have sinned. That is what makes stealing wrong. That is what makes lying wrong.
That is what makes adultery wrong. That is what makes gossiping wrong. That
is what makes abortion wrong. Practically every law that has ever existed has
been based upon the underlying principle that there are self-evident moral absolutes-particularly
that selfish acts which harm others are morally wrong. And laws that dont
reflect that principle-laws that favor one person over another-we detest.
When the hedonistic playboy stands before God, the Creator wont buy his
excuse that he didnt know what was right and what was wrong. God will
have volumes of incontrovertible evidence from the mans daily life proving
his obvious belief in a standard of conduct. Every time the man criticized another
person for acting selfishly, his own words testified of his belief in moral
absolutes and thus condemned him.
That is precisely what will take place at his judgment before God. God has a
record of each persons every careless word. Read what Jesus said:
And I say to you, that every careless word that men shall speak,
they shall render account for it in the day of judgment. For by your words you
shall be justified, and by your words you shall be condemned (Matthew
12:36-37; emphasis added).
Now before we self-righteously condemn every self-seeking playboy, dont
forget that all of us are in the same boat, either bow or stern. All of us have
broken the sacred rule that Jesus said sums up the moral teaching of the Old Testament:
Do unto others as you want them to do unto you. All of us stand self-condemned
before God because of our own judgments of others.
The Oldest Law Code
Lets answer the question of where the idea of moral absolutes originated.
Who decided that selfishness is wrong?
Lets look specifically at adultery. Was it some ancient religious killjoy
who decided that adultery is a sin? If it was, then which one was it?
Was it some prudish New England Puritan who dreamed it up? No.
Was it a group of ascetic monks in the dark ages? No.
Did Jesus introduce it? No.
Surely it must have begun with Moses and the Ten Commandments. No, it didnt.
You see, archaeologists have uncovered the civil codes of several ancient cultures,
codes that even predate the Ten Commandments by hundreds of years. Probably
the most well-known example would be the Code of Hammurabi (an ancient king of
Babylon).
Discovered in 1901 by French archaeologist Jacques de Morgan,
the Code contained 282 laws inscribed upon a stone shaft, dated around 1750 B.C.,
and now preserved in the Louvre in Paris.
And what did Hammurabi, who lived three to five centuries before the Ten Commandments
were given, have to say on the subject of adultery? Read it for yourself:
If the wife of
a man has been caught while lying with another man, they shall bind them [together]
and throw them into the water.1
Its as obvious as a
whale in a wading pool: everyone, everywhere, has always known that there are
moral absolutes.
So when did the idea originate that selfishness is wrong? As I said in the second
chapter, the answer ought to be obvious to anyone who has ever heard a two-year
old protest, Thats not fair! His protest is based on an inborn
principle.
Every person is born with the knowledge of moral absolutes. That knowledge has
been given to him by God, and that is exactly what the Bible teaches.
Our Conscience, Where Gods Law is Written
In the book of Romans, chapter two, the apostle Paul compares Gods revelation
to the Jews with His revelation to the Gentiles. The Jews were given the Ten Commandments-engraved
upon tablets of stone by the finger of God-but the non-Jewish people, the Gentiles,
never had that privilege. Paul states, however, that every Gentile has had Gods
law written upon his heart by God Himself. That inward law of God is what we refer
to as our conscience.
For when Gentiles
who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these,
not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the
Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness,
and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when,
according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus
(Romans 2:14-16; emphasis added).
Youve no doubt seen the cartoons of the person who has the devil sitting
on one shoulder and an angel on the other shoulder, each one speaking into an
ear. Actually there is more theological truth to that picture than many people
realize. The error in it is that our moral instructions dont come from the
outside-they come from the inside. They are, as Paul said, instinctive.
Weve all perceived that inward guidance that leads us to resist the temptation
to be selfish. Probably everyone has obeyed that inward leading to some degree.
But all of us, more or less, have violated it more than we care to admit.
Why did God give us a conscience? The apostle Paul revealed the reason in the
above-quoted verse, and it only makes logical sense: Someday, God is going to
judge us on the basis of whether or not we obeyed our conscience, whether or not
we did what we knew we were supposed to do.
Why is that so important to God? Because God has an ultimate plan for a future
perfect society, and selfish people wont fit in there. In the final chapter,
well examine what the Bible has to say concerning this future society.
Of course, since all of us have violated our conscience, we all stand condemned
before God, deserving whatever punishment He deems appropriate. There isnt
a person reading this book who hasnt acted selfishly. Most of us have led
lives that are characterized by selfishness. As I pointed out in the previous
chapter, even our good deeds are selfishly motivated.
We wine and dine others to get something from them.
We flatter people in order to gain an advantage.
We serve unselfishly so others will know how unselfish we are.
We volunteer so we can add a self-promoting paragraph to our resume´.
We obey the law motivated by a fear of getting caught and suffering the consequences-rather
than a true concern for those who would be hurt by our breaking the law.
We give gifts so the recipients will think more highly of us. Too often, our gifts
are really bribes. And if we arent immediately thanked in proportion to
the amount spent on the gift, we criticize the recipient behind his back! (Now
isnt that unselfish love!)
table of contents | previous chapter | next chapter | top of page | buy this book | home
But realize
this, that in the last days difficult times will come. For men will be lovers
of self... (2 Timothy 3:1-2a; emphasis added).
Endnote
1. Samuel Noah Kramer, Cradle of Civilization. Alexandria,
VA: Time-Life Books, 1978, p. 82. Back to text.
We’re so thankful that we can provide the teaching you’ve just read. Although it was free for you, it wasn’t actually free...someone else paid for it. If you’ve been blessed, can you help us bless others? We’re equipping pastors in many developing nations by freely giving them books in their own languages. Those books contain many of the same articles available on our website, but most often, the pastors we help don’t have affordable internet access. Your donation, large or small, can make a difference. Just click the PayPal button below. Thank you!
|